A simple english statement: A woman without her man is nothing.
How can this be interpreted??
1. A woman, without her man, is nothing.
2.A woman: without her, man is nothing.
No man is a boss of woman and no woman is a boss of man. In a relationship they both should be equal and mutual. Afterall a woman is created for a man and a man is created for a woman...A very simple truth but seldom recognized by people.
P.S: Actually it came as a mail to me explaining the imporatnce of punctuation marks. But could find a lot of truth in it so just blogged it....
5 comments:
exactly dude... we speak abt caste creed n all ... but heres the first differentiation dat ppl make... but we dont point dat out coz God has made it ;) .... but its better to differentiate only to a limit that God has made and do not excede that...
p.s : I dont i shudnt mention about God in your blog... but it jus flew ;) ...
orey, mari homos sangati enti :P
@Simmi
Well well....GOD...ur "GOD" can do anythning n everything so i'd better not offend u...
@Freaky
Hehe dats a fantastic doubt ;) Mayb u ask ur canada frnd Rags :|...jus kidding
mmm...travelling lo doubt vacchindhi..Romeo anna peru enduku?
@Ron
Aa peru my fav ":> though it has no relation to me... i still dint find my juliet :((... mayb naa juliet vachinapudu romio n juliet ani martademo :D
Post a Comment